Scott Jennings got into a heated debate during the Thursday, April 30, broadcast of CNN NewsNight.
Jennings, 48, and his fellow panelists spoke about the ongoing Iran conflict on Thursday’s episode, in which the former political staffer disagreed with his counterparts about the war.
“When you get up past your bedtime, you get hyper,” he told progressive commentator Adam Mockler, who asked Jennings to name “a single concession” the United States received from Iran since the dispute began.
Mockler, 23, later responded to Jennings’ jabs and defense of the political conflict.
“We all know that Scott Jennings is more than happy to defend a war with a country that starts with letters ‘I-r-a’ that we are currently failing, that is going to put us trillions and trillions of dollars more in debt,” Mockler retorted. “I was only a few years old while you were in the administration defending prior endless wars. Now, this war is failing.”
“Eight weeks is endless to you?” Jennings responded. “You have the attention span of a gnat?”
Mockler further alleged that Jennings was only “making condescending remarks” because the war wasn’t going his way.
“‘Not going your way?’ Get your f***ing hand out of my face first,” Jennings told Mockler, who had been pointing his fingers in the air. “Honestly, I’m not going to have this guy’s hand in my face. Honestly.”
Moderator Abby Phillip subsequently asked Jennings and Mockler to cool down.
“Everybody hang tight,” Phillip, 37, calmly said. “Everybody calm down. We’re having a debate. You can respond to the points that he’s making.”
After Jennings’ fellow panelists peppered him with questions about his viewpoint, he addressed his perspective.
“We have a very simple goal to keep terrorists and a terrorist regime from having a nuclear weapon that can threaten the United States, our interest in the region, our allies in Europe and anybody else,” Jennings added. “That is our goal.”
Phillip abruptly wrapped the segment, concluding, “We’re going to leave it there, guys.”
Phillip often tries to mediate any broadcast debates without raising her voice.
“I would be lying if I told you that there were not times when I’ve wanted to,” she previously told Variety in 2024. “I don’t think that’s helpful for an audience for me to add to the cacophony of sound. People should know that I’m always trying to make sure that if I hear something that isn’t right and I know something isn’t right, I’m going to say something about it.”

