![\"Every](\"https:\/\/www.usmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/02\/Every-Easter-Egg-Taylor-Swift-Left-Fans-for-The-Tortured-Poets-Department-3.jpg?crop=0px%2C25px%2C2000px%2C1131px&resize=400%2C225&quality=86&strip=all\")
<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n\n\t\t\tRelated: <\/span>Every Easter Egg Taylor Swift Teased for \u2018The Tortured Poets Department\u2019<\/span><\/a>
\n\t\t<\/h3>\n<\/p><\/div>\n\n\t\t\tMarcelo Endelli\/TAS23\/Getty Images While Taylor Swift\u2019s The Tortured Poets Department came as a surprise to fans, the pop star seemingly left several Easter eggs hinting that her 11th studio album was on its way. Swift revealed her latest musical endeavor while accepting the award for Best Pop Vocal Album \u2014 her 13th career win \u2014 [\u2026]\t\t<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
A third person added: \u201cQuick, everyone start making fake ai tracks for TTPD<\/em> so we don\u2019t know if the leaks are real or not.\u201d<\/p>\nIf the leaks prove to be legitimate, this would not be the first time one of Swift\u2019s albums found its way to the public prior to release day. 2014\u2019s 1989<\/em> leaked three days before its drop date, despite Swift taking efforts to keep the music under wraps.<\/p>\n\u201cI have a lot of maybe-\/maybe-not-irrational fears of security invasion, wiretaps, people eavesdropping,\u201d Swift shared during an October 2014 episode of Jimmy Kimmel Live!<\/em>, adding that for months the only copy of the album in existence was on her phone.<\/p>\nIf the leaks prove to be legitimate, this would not be the first time one of Swift\u2019s albums found its way to the public prior to release day. Ahead of her third album, Fearless<\/em>, Swift\u2019s lead single \u201cMine\u201d was leaked online.<\/p>\n\u201c[My manager] said, \u2018I don\u2019t want you to panic.\u2019 And I said, \u2018The song leaked, didn\u2019t it?\u2019\u201d Swift told MTV News in a 2008 interview. \u201cI turned on my phone and there were texts saying, \u2018Congratulations<\/span>.\u2019 A leak is so out of my comfort zone, but it ended up good in the end. It made me so emotional that I started crying.\u201d<\/p>\n\n![\"Taylor](\"https:\/\/www.usmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2024\/04\/Taylor-Swift-Leak-Is-Banned-Search-Term-on-X-Amid-Suspected-Tortured-Poets-Department-Leak-894.jpg?w=1000&quality=86&strip=all\")
<\/div>
\n Taylor Swift.<\/span> Gotham\/GC Images<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nSwift has since put in fail safes to keep people from gaining access to her music too soon. In 2014, she opened up about how she keeps her songs under wraps during an interview on Jimmy Kimmel Live!.<\/em><\/p>\n\u201cI have a lot of maybe-\/maybe-not-irrational fears of security invasion, wiretaps, people eavesdropping,\u201d she explained, adding that for months the only copy of her fifth studio album, 1989<\/em>, in existence was on her phone.<\/p>\nThe effort however, wasn\u2019t successful, as 1989<\/em> leaked four days ahead of its release. The same happened for 2017\u2019s Reputation<\/em> and 2019\u2019s Lover<\/em>, when both leaked 12 hours ahead of their release dates.<\/p>\nThat still hasn\u2019t stopped Swift from continuing to put defenses in place to keep her music locked down. In 2018, the singer revealed that she often has her dancers perform to a \u201cclick track\u201d in music video shoots to avoid her songs being heard.<\/p>\n
\n\n\nThank You!<\/h3>\n
You have successfully subscribed.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n
If the leaks prove to be legitimate, this would not be the first time one of Swift\u2019s albums found its way to the public prior to release day. 2014\u2019s 1989<\/em> leaked three days before its drop date, despite Swift taking efforts to keep the music under wraps.<\/p>\n \u201cI have a lot of maybe-\/maybe-not-irrational fears of security invasion, wiretaps, people eavesdropping,\u201d Swift shared during an October 2014 episode of Jimmy Kimmel Live!<\/em>, adding that for months the only copy of the album in existence was on her phone.<\/p>\n If the leaks prove to be legitimate, this would not be the first time one of Swift\u2019s albums found its way to the public prior to release day. Ahead of her third album, Fearless<\/em>, Swift\u2019s lead single \u201cMine\u201d was leaked online.<\/p>\n \u201c[My manager] said, \u2018I don\u2019t want you to panic.\u2019 And I said, \u2018The song leaked, didn\u2019t it?\u2019\u201d Swift told MTV News in a 2008 interview. \u201cI turned on my phone and there were texts saying, \u2018Congratulations<\/span>.\u2019 A leak is so out of my comfort zone, but it ended up good in the end. It made me so emotional that I started crying.\u201d<\/p>\n Swift has since put in fail safes to keep people from gaining access to her music too soon. In 2014, she opened up about how she keeps her songs under wraps during an interview on Jimmy Kimmel Live!.<\/em><\/p>\n \u201cI have a lot of maybe-\/maybe-not-irrational fears of security invasion, wiretaps, people eavesdropping,\u201d she explained, adding that for months the only copy of her fifth studio album, 1989<\/em>, in existence was on her phone.<\/p>\n The effort however, wasn\u2019t successful, as 1989<\/em> leaked four days ahead of its release. The same happened for 2017\u2019s Reputation<\/em> and 2019\u2019s Lover<\/em>, when both leaked 12 hours ahead of their release dates.<\/p>\n That still hasn\u2019t stopped Swift from continuing to put defenses in place to keep her music locked down. In 2018, the singer revealed that she often has her dancers perform to a \u201cclick track\u201d in music video shoots to avoid her songs being heard.<\/p>\n You have successfully subscribed.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div><\/div>\n<\/div>
\n Taylor Swift.<\/span> Gotham\/GC Images<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\nThank You!<\/h3>\n
![\"Every](\"https:\/\/www.usmagazine.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2023\/04\/Every-Taylor-Swift-Song-Seemingly-Inspired-by-Joe-Alwyn.jpg?crop=125px%2C0px%2C1746px%2C986px&resize=400%2C225&quality=86&strip=all\")
<\/div>\n<\/figure>\n