\n<\/p>\n
After a long reprieve from serious congressional scrutiny, lawmakers are taking another crack at getting TikTok to sever ties from its Chinese parent company, ByteDance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
If enacted, the bill would impose a civil penalty on app stores and web hosting services that distribute TikTok and other covered services, unless the app is separated from Chinese ownership. The penalty for an app store that violates the law would be calculated by multiplying the number of US users that \u201caccessed, maintained or, or updated\u201d the foreign adversary app by $5,000. The bill would be enforced by the US attorney general.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
It also creates a process for the president to designate other social media companies from foreign adversary countries like China, Russia, Iran, and North Korea as subject to the bill \u2014 meaning apps owned by designated companies that are distributed in the US would need to sever ties to continue operating there.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Yet concerns over the RESTRICT Act\u2019s reach and the authority it would grant to the executive branch eventually stalled movement on the issue.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
The new legislation was crafted in an attempt to avoid potential constitutional concerns. For example, though it names ByteDance, it is tailored to avoid being seen as a penalty on an individual company. That\u2019s in part because the bill allows for a 165-day period for ByteDance to avoid a ban on its apps if it divests them during that time; it also creates a process by which it could be applied to other apps. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
While TikTok is owned by a Chinese company, it has maintained that it keeps US user data on servers outside of the country and is working on plans to get US data even further out of reach from China-based ByteDance employees. Many lawmakers have expressed concern that China\u2019s national security law could compel ByteDance to hand over information on US users if they have access to it.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Despite bipartisan concern, it remains a major question if any action to divest or ban TikTok can reignite momentum during an election year \u2014 especially one where TikTok is a useful tool for candidates hoping to secure their seats<\/a>. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n