\n<\/p>\n
Logan Paul is offering refunds for CryptoZoo, the failed and allegedly fraudulent Pok\u00e9mon-inspired NFT game<\/a> that he launched in 2021. The catch? You can\u2019t sue him if you get a refund.<\/p>\n In an X (formerly Twitter) post<\/a> on Thursday, Paul announced that he is \u201cpersonally committing\u201d more than $2.3 million to buy back NFTs purchased through CryptoZoo. Claims can be submitted online<\/a> until February 8.<\/p>\n \u201cI never made a single penny from the project, period. In fact, the opposite is true, because I spent hundreds of thousands of dollars trying to make it happen,\u201d Paul said in his post. \u201cLike you, I was highly disappointed that the game was not delivered.\u201d<\/p>\n Claimants will receive 0.1 ETH per eligible NFT \u2014 known as \u201cBase Eggs\u201d and \u201cBase Animals.\u201d Players were supposed to be able to \u201cbreed\u201d the animals that \u201chatched\u201d from the base NFT that they purchased, which would create \u201chybrid\u201d animals that were also NFTs. Hybrid animals are not eligible for the buy-back program.<\/p>\n The form\u2019s terms and conditions also note that any submitted NFTs that Paul \u201cin his sole discretion deems ineligible\u201d will not be returned. To be eligible for a refund, claimants also have to agree to waive any \u201cactual or anticipated claims against Paul\u201d \u2014 which means promising not to take legal action against him in relation to CryptoZoo.<\/p>\n The influencer, who faces a class action lawsuit<\/a> for allegedly making millions of dollars of cryptocurrency by promoting a game that ultimately didn\u2019t exist, also filed a cross-claim. In an X post<\/a>, he said that he \u201cfiled a lawsuit in federal court in Texas to hold these bad actors accountable.\u201d<\/p>\n \u201cThis lawsuit is the result of an exhaustive investigation that included the review of the entirety of conversations and tracking nefarious trading activity related to the project,\u201d Paul continued in his X post. \u201cNefarious trading activity taken behind our backs, without our knowledge, and with the intention of defrauding us all.\u201d<\/p>\n Rob Freund, a Los Angeles-based lawyer who represents brands and creators, told TechCrunch that the buy-back program could be Paul\u2019s attempt at minimizing damages. Class action lawsuits can be \u201cdevastating\u201d for defendants, as damages can include what the plaintiff and class members initially lost, in addition to punitive damages and attorney\u2019s fees. Freund suggested that by refunding NFTs in exchange for waiving claims against him, Paul can individually settle with class members, effectively minimizing the potential damages.<\/p>\n \u201cPaul may be betting (or at least hoping) that enough people who would otherwise be potential class members will take him up on this offer and drastically reduce his potential exposure in the pending case by doing so,\u201d Freund said. \u201cThat would let him angle for a much more favorable settlement.\u201d<\/p>\n