Bitcoin mines aren\u2019t just energy-hungry, it turns out they\u2019re thirsty, too. The water consumption tied to a single Bitcoin transaction, on average, could be enough to fill a small backyard pool, according to a new analysis. Bitcoin mines are essentially big data centers, which have become notorious for how much electricity and water they use. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n
Bitcoin\u2019s water footprint is growing, according to the analysis published today in a commentary in the journal Cell Reports Sustainability<\/em><\/a>. That\u2019s an issue to watch as the price of Bitcoin recovers<\/a> from a spiraling crypto winter<\/a>. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n Bitcoin mines are essentially big data centers, which have become notorious for how much electricity and water they use. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n The study was conducted by Alex de Vries, a PhD candidate at Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam whose previous research<\/a> has tracked cryptocurrencies\u2019 electricity consumption and greenhouse gas emissions. Those issues have moved legislators to push for more oversight<\/a> of crypto mines\u2019 environmental impact. But until recently, most of that attention has been on whether energy-intensive cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin might throw off countries\u2019 climate goals.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Bitcoin mining also has the potential to stress water resources in drought-prone areas. Miners use specialized computers to solve puzzles around the clock to validate transactions and earn Bitcoin in return. All that computing power burns through a lot of energy. And like other data centers, many crypto mines also end up using a good deal of water in their cooling systems to keep machines from overheating. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u201cIt\u2019s sort of hard to surprise me, given how I\u2019ve already worked on this topic I\u2019m kind of used to big numbers popping up. But then again, the numbers are still mind blowing even to me every time I look at it,\u201d de Vries told The Verge<\/em>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n To conduct his analysis, de Vries estimated the direct water use from Bitcoin mines\u2019 cooling systems. He also added their indirect water consumption associated with electricity generation, since power plants also use water in cooling systems. All in all, he found that cryptocurrency mining used about 1,600 gigaliters of water in 2021 when the price of Bitcoin peaked at over $65,000. That comes out to a small swimming pool\u2019s worth of water (16,000 liters), on average, for each transaction. It\u2019s about 6.2 million times more water than a credit card swipe, according to de Vries. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n Of course, everything dipped in 2022 as the price of Bitcoin plunged and mining slowed<\/a>. But the price has climbed back up since last year, rising from less than $20,000 to around $38,000 today. The higher the price, the more incentive there is to ramp up mining. That\u2019s why de Vries expects the cryptocurrency\u2019s water consumption to rise to a new high of 2,300 gigaliters worldwide this year. In the US, the biggest hub<\/a> for Bitcoin mining in the world, Bitcoin mining uses about as much annually as a city the size of Washington, DC. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n These numbers are estimates based on the assumption that the Bitcoin mines run on water-dependent cooling systems typical in large data centers. However, some data centers and crypto mines<\/a> use a different system that keeps computers cool and cuts down water consumption by immersing them in a non-conductive liquid<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n There\u2019s another way to get the cryptocurrency to use a fraction of the water and electricity it eats up now and slash greenhouse gas emissions: get rid of the mining process altogether and find a new way to validate transactions. That\u2019s what the next biggest cryptocurrency network, Ethereum, accomplished<\/a> last year. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n If Bitcoin was to do something similar, \u201call the electricity consumption, associated water consumption, that will just disappear overnight. You know, we can make it happen,\u201d de Vries said. \u201cApparently, people still prefer to argue that the network isn\u2019t as bad as we think it is, rather than actually trying to do something about it.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n