\n<\/p>\n
In case you<\/span> missed it, Sam Altman is back as OpenAI CEO<\/a>. His reinstatement comes after a whirlwind few days in which we saw unusual corporate governance lead to an attempt to oust Altman, despite support from both Microsoft and the vast majority of OpenAI\u2019s workforce. While the whole process was incredibly messy, the result seems very likely to be a stronger OpenAI, with new clarity around mission and purpose.<\/p>\n To be clear, nothing about this felt intentional or strategic: in fact, every twist and turn seem to come shockingly out of nowhere, from Microsoft\u2019s offer to hire Altman and Greg Brockman<\/a>, to the shock drop-in of Twitch co-founder Emmett Shear as interim CEO<\/a> \u2013 and who could\u2019ve predicted the Harry Potter fanfic community tie-in<\/a>.<\/p>\n Despite the \u00a0sheer chaos of how we got here, I think the result will ultimately be a much stronger and more unified OpenAI, which, while it doesn\u2019t benefit Microsoft in quite the same way<\/a> as acquiring the team, without acquiring the company, still means Satya Nadella and Redmond probably come out better off than before, too.<\/p>\n First, the reformed OpenAI government structure will likely be a lot more friendly towards Microsoft, which offers it predictability and stability from its key partner in the generative AI race. Second, Nadella\u2019s guidance and support of Altman and Brockman, and the ultimately victorious team made up of their allies, likely won\u2019t be forgotten anytime soon. Nadella wisely secured himself a position as a key ally, and confidant to arguably the most powerful person in generative AI today.<\/p>\n For OpenAI itself, the entire episode led to a \u2018rallying of the troops,\u2019 as evidenced by the list of employees who ended up signing the open letter to the board demanding Altman\u2019s return<\/a>. In the end, over 710 of the company\u2019s 770 employees had signed the letter, which also demanded that the existing board resigned; it\u2019s possible, the number would\u2019ve been even higher, if some of the employees hadn\u2019t been reliant on their OpenAI jobs for immigration purposes.<\/p>\n While you can\u2019t really count that as a pure play approval rating, given the polarized circumstances in which it arose, it is still an extremely significant indication of support for Altman\u2019s leadership and philosophy, when it comes to OpenAI\u2019s business strategy. The letter and its signatory count obviously don\u2019t tell the whole story, but moments like this tend to erode small doubts and discrepancies, and temper a new unity of purpose for companies with mission-driven values.<\/p>\n Another point in OpenAI\u2019s favor: while Altman is the star of the show, Brockman also demonstrated terrific leadership and commitment throughout the ordeal, which has to earn him additional loyalty from the OpenAI employee base. He proudly tweeted about the company shipping product updates<\/a> in the midst of everything going down \u2014 even while he was technically not an employee there \u2014 and he reiterated that commitment to shipping<\/a> shortly after news broke of the resolution.<\/p>\n If, as some speculate, the main reason for the rift between the outgoing board and Altman were concerns over the speed at which OpenAI was progressing towards its goal of AGI, then the board\u2019s actions have had exactly the opposite effect they intended. OpenAI is now reformed as a more unified whole, with a clear focus on pursuing Altman\u2019s goals of ensconcing it as the leader in the emerging generative AI mega-industry.<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n