\n<\/p>\n
In February 2022, a pair of prosecutors investigating Donald Trump<\/strong> for the Manhattan district attorney\u2019s office abruptly resigned<\/a> over reported frustration that new DA Alvin Bragg<\/strong> had doubts about taking the case against the ex-president to court. At the time, one of those prosecutors, Mark Pomerantz,<\/strong> wrote a resignation letter expressing said frustration, which apparently stemmed primarily from the fact that, in his professional opinion, the former president was and is guilty as s–t<\/a>. \u00a0\u201cThe team that has been investigating Mr. Trump harbors no doubt about whether he committed crimes\u2014he did,\u201d Pomerantz wrote. And one year later, he believes that more than ever.<\/p>\n In an interview<\/a> with 60 Minutes<\/em> ahead of the release of his book, People vs. Donald Trump,<\/em> Pomerantz\u00a0told CBS News\u2019 Bill Whitaker<\/strong>: \u201cIf you take the exact same conduct\u2014and make it not about Donald Trump and not about a former president of the United States, would the case have been indicted? It would have been indicted in a flat second.\u201d<\/p>\n Pomerantz also compared<\/a> Trump to a reputed mob boss, reportedly writing in the book, of Trump: \u201cHe demanded absolute loyalty and would go after anyone who crossed him. He seemed always to stay one step ahead of the law\u2026. In my career as a lawyer, I had encountered only one other person who touched all of these bases: John Gotti, the head of the Gambino organized crime family.\u201d<\/p>\n Anyway, Trump has apparently been keeping tabs on Pomerantz and has taken his remarks in characteristic stride, by which we mean has had a full-on social media meltdown, writing<\/a> on Truth Social:<\/p>\n Wow, the book just put out by Crooked Hillary Clinton<\/strong>\u2019s attorney, Mark Pomerantz, is turning out to be a hit on the District Attorney and the \u201cweak\u201d case \u201cwith many fatal flaws.\u201d Prosecutors in the D.A.\u2019s Office actually quit in protest in that they thought it was \u201cirresponsible\u201d and very \u201cunfair\u201d to \u201cPresident Trump.\u201dThey also felt they didn\u2019t want to rely on a SleazeBag disbarred Lawyer From Hell like Michael Cohen<\/strong> as a witness. IN OTHER WORDS, THEY THOUGHT THE CASE WAS TERRIBLE – A LOSER!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n