The Lightning connector really only had two jobs: be tiny and be foolproof. Apple developed the new port for the iPhone 5<\/a>, which at the time was simultaneously the largest, thinnest, and lightest iPhone the company had ever made. That made every millimeter of space and milligram of weight matter. For nearly a decade, Apple\u2019s go-to connector had been the 30-pin Dock Connector, which was positively gigantic \u2014\u00a0about four times the size of a standard Micro USB plug. The Dock Connector was also fragile and a bit fussy. You had to stick the cable in just so in order to get the little hooks on the end to attach to the port. After a decade of Dock Connector, Apple needed something better<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n When Apple introduced Lightning<\/a> at its annual fall event in 2012, company executives talked a lot about how small it was. \u201cGiven the dimensions of the new phone and all the capability that we wanted to add,\u201d Bob Mansfield, then the company\u2019s head of hardware engineering, said in a pre-produced video breathlessly detailing the phone\u2019s every aspect, \u201cwe needed to manage the space inside the phone very carefully.\u201d Phil Schiller, the company\u2019s marketing chief, proudly flashed a slide that claimed Lightning was 80 percent smaller than the Dock Connector.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n But while Apple might have needed the connector for its waif dimensions, the company also clearly understood why regular users might like it. \u201cIt\u2019s more durable and much easier to use,\u201d Schiller said with a small laugh, \u201cbecause now you can plug it in in either direction; it doesn\u2019t matter.\u201d As he said all this, he twisted his hands back and forth, miming plugging in a cable. Everybody knows you never plug in a USB cable right the first time; with Lightning, you couldn\u2019t get it wrong.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n This week, 11 years to the day after that launch event, it appears virtually certain that Apple is going to remove the Lightning connector from the iPhone. A new law in the European Union<\/a> mandates that all phones sold in its member countries must use USB-C for physical charging, and Apple has acknowledged it will have to follow the rules. \u201cObviously, we\u2019ll have to comply,\u201d Apple\u2019s current marketing chief, Greg Joswiak, said last year<\/a>. \u201cWe have no choice.\u201d While that requirement doesn\u2019t go into effect until next year, a steady stream of rumors and reports suggest Apple\u2019s going to make the change now.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n To some extent, it\u2019s a natural transition. Apple played a large role in the development of the USB-C standard, which was first introduced in 2014. Apple immediately went all in on the new connector: the next year, it released a new 12-inch MacBook that used USB-C and only USB-C. \u201cThe team decided, if we\u2019re going to have a port in here, let\u2019s make the most versatile connector we\u2019ve ever put in a notebook,\u201d Schiller said of the USB-C port. \u201cAnd sure enough, they did.\u201d He explained two specific reasons users were going to love it: it was tiny, and it was reversible.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Over the next couple of years, most Macs and iPads switched over, too. The iPhone could easily have had a USB-C port years ago. Apple hasn\u2019t made the switch for a number of reasons, not least of them financial: using a proprietary connector gave Apple control over the vast accessory market<\/a> and revenue from everyone who made Lightning gear. In general, Apple doesn\u2019t seem to appreciate being told to switch to USB-C but shouldn\u2019t have much trouble doing so.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Still, make no mistake: this switch is going to be complicated. For one thing, a huge number of iPhone owners will be forced to replace all their cables or, at the very least, buy a bunch of unsightly dongles to keep their stuff working. There are also way too many standards inside of the USB-C standard, and don\u2019t be shocked if Apple introduces one of its own just to make things more confusing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The iPhone easily could have had a USB-C port years ago<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n But when it all shakes out, practically the entire tech industry will be able to use the same cables, the same docks, the same everything for the first time ever. They\u2019ll be small, and they\u2019ll be foolproof. Just like Lightning. Except this time, they\u2019ll be for everybody.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Oliver Seil, the head of design at accessory giant Belkin, has almost universally nice things to say about the Lightning connector. \u201cI look at the overall arc of technology development,\u201d he says, \u201cand I think it goes from cumbersome \u2014 humans have to change to accommodate technology \u2014 to the other way around, where technology serves the human better.\u201d Lightning took the tiny annoyance of wiggling your charger into place and made it effortless. That matters a lot, especially with your most-used device.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Even the early Lightning connectors were robust and secure, and while Apple was pretty heavy-handed<\/a> in how it handled accessory licenses in the early days, it eventually spawned a huge ecosystem of cool gear. \u201cIt goes from wobbly, large, janky, to very elegant and small and bidirectional,\u201d Seil says. This seems obvious now \u2014\u00a0how annoying is it to dig that one Micro USB cable out and then struggle to plug it in correctly? \u2014\u00a0but at the time was an unexpected breath of fresh air.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n But there\u2019s this one thing about Lightning that Seil always thought was a little silly. \u201cYou remember the first Pencil, right?\u201d he asks. \u201cIt was a phenomenal product, but it needed to be charged with Lightning.\u201d But you didn\u2019t charge it by plugging something into the Pencil; you had to plug the Pencil into<\/em> something<\/em>. Pencils sticking out of iPads became a meme; this is just not how charging should work. And Seil\u2019s broader point is that Lightning cables still have some other connector on the other side. \u201cYou just start experiencing these issues where it\u2019s not the same on both sides.\u201d As much as anything else, that\u2019s what makes USB-C great. Not only is the connector reversible so that you can\u2019t plug it in wrong, but so are the sides of the cable itself.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Of course, even as he explains the beauty of the system, Seil laughs. If only it actually worked this way! \u201cRight now, you can literally take a USB-C charger with two USB ports, plug one cable into your gadget and the other into the wall, and nothing will happen.\u201d USB-C is theoretically a universal standard, but in practice, it\u2019s anything but. They differ mainly in speed of data and power transfer, and Seil\u2019s theory is that users are going to have to get used to memorizing their own particular power needs and searching for them on Best Buy boxes. One persistent rumor about the iPhone 15 is that it will have a Thunderbolt port<\/a> instead of a standard USB-C one, which uses the same shape but is a more expensive and more adaptable connector to different speeds and USB versions. That could help alleviate some of the confusion, at least for your iPhone.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Let\u2019s be optimistic here for a minute, though. Fast-forward a bit until we reach the moment where the charging protocols are truly universal; maybe Thunderbolt wins out, maybe we all learn our device wattages by heart, but however we get there, all our cables and accessories work with all our devices, based on a standard that\u2019s not going away. Seil thinks that could be the best thing to ever happen to the accessory business. \u201cThe number one concern for most regular people is, if I go buy this charger, will it work with my device<\/em>?\u201d he says. \u201cIf I go to the store, and it tells me it\u2019s compatible with most smartphones, I don\u2019t know what that means for me.\u201d He figures that not only will people have more accessories to choose from once the market isn\u2019t split by device, but they might be willing to buy more and better stuff, knowing their gear will still work even if they upgrade or switch.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Let\u2019s go back to 2012 for a second, to that iPhone 5 launch event. As he began to explain the thinking behind the Lightning connector, Schiller argued that, actually, the larger change is that we don\u2019t need cables like we used to. \u201cSo many of the things we used to do over the wire, we now do wirelessly,\u201d he said. Bluetooth audio had replaced the AUX cord for so many; people were syncing their devices and files over Wi-Fi rather than by plugging their phone into iTunes. With that as the buildup, Schiller then\u2026 announced a new system for cables.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n At the time, Schiller poo-pooed the idea of wireless charging. \u201cHaving to create another device you have to plug into the wall is actually, for most situations, more complicated,\u201d he said in an interview with AllThingsD<\/em><\/a> when he was asked why the iPhone 5 didn\u2019t have NFC or wireless charging. It wasn\u2019t until the iPhone 8 in 2017 that Apple\u2019s smartphones first got wireless charging, and by then, Schiller had changed his tune considerably. \u201cWords can\u2019t describe just how much nicer it is to just put it down and pick it up whenever you want to charge, without ever having to plug in a cable again.\u201d He said you might have a wireless charger in your bedroom; he said your local cafe might have them embedded in every table.\u00a0<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Practically ever since, rumors have swirled that Apple\u2019s ultimate plan is to build an entirely port-free iPhone<\/a>. It\u2019s actually not far off, having ditched the headphone jack and the SIM tray. In recent years, Apple has heavily marketed MagSafe as a charging system, and one of the flagship features of iOS 17 \u2014 the StandBy Mode \u2014\u00a0is clearly designed in part to get people used to the idea of putting their phone on a charging dock.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n In some ways, Lightning was a stopgap connector until we got to USB-C. Maybe USB-C, at least on our smartphones, is just a similar way station on the way to truly great wireless charging. What if what\u2019s really next is that wireless charging is about to really take off? In recent weeks, we\u2019ve seen a slew of gadgets embracing the new Qi2 standard<\/a>, which purports to wirelessly charge devices both faster and more reliably. Accessory makers, big and small, are beginning to sell pads, stands, and other gizmos that wirelessly charge multiple devices at a time. And, of course, Apple, which has been practically forced to install a USB-C port on its iPhones, has plenty of reasons to tout MagSafe as the way of the future.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n A portless iPhone is a bad idea, at least for now. But if, as Seil says, the arc of technology is away from making humans work and toward making tech that just works<\/em>, wireless charging feels like a clear step in that direction. All this won\u2019t happen the minute an iPhone has a USB-C port. But this is the next phase: universal systems that create less waste, cause fewer headaches, and simply work the way they should. Lightning helped make it easy to plug in. Now Apple \u2014 and the rest of the industry \u2014 might be inching closer to ditching the plug altogether.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\nJust plug it in<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/p>\n
Just put it down<\/strong><\/h3>\n<\/p>\n