Warning: Spoilers ahead for season 2 of Amazon Prime\u2019s Good Omens<\/strong><\/em><\/p>\n<\/div>\n With the release of the second season of Good Omens<\/em> on July 28th<\/a>, writer Neil Gaiman has officially (and rather devastatingly) put any accusations of queerbaiting to bed. Leaving very little room for interpretation, Crowley and Aziraphale \u2014 the respectively demonic and angelic main characters of the Amazon fantasy-comedy series \u2014 engaged in some distressingly emotional snogging during the last moments of this season\u2019s final episode, thereby ending over 30 years of speculation about the nature of their relationship. The fight is over. The shippers have won.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Well, not just<\/em> the shippers.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n I\u2019ll provide some context for those of you who aren\u2019t chronically online: \u201cshipping\u201d refers to the act of endorsing a romantic or sexual relationship between two real or fictitious characters. The term comes from the X-Files<\/em> fandom in the \u201990s, which was generally split into \u201crelationshippers\u201d and \u201cNoromo\u201d fans who… well, I think you can guess their feelings on the central couple of Mulder and Scully. Over time, \u201crelationshipper\u201d shortened to \u201cshipper,\u201d and other fandoms adopted the term when talking about their own favorite couples in fandom. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n Ineffable Husbands \u2014 the ship name for Crowely and Aziraphale \u2014 emerged after Good Omens<\/em> was released in 2019, but some fans have endorsed a relationship between the two since the original novel penned by Gaiman and the late Terry Pratchett debuted in 1990. The characters are frequently described (in both the book and the series) as sexless cosmic beings that don\u2019t need to understand silly human concepts like gender or sexuality. But there\u2019s an obvious inclination to view them as male-coded, especially with David Tennant and Michael Sheen\u2019s respective portrayals of Crowley and Aziraphale.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n An overwhelming majority of the intimate interactions depicted in the second season were visibly, undeniably<\/em> queer. It wasn\u2019t just that core relationship between these two celestial beings. There\u2019s a secondary storyline that focuses on a lesbian love story, alongside additional romantic representation for other LGBTQ and \/ or nonbinary characters. Plus, a vast majority of these interactions take place in London\u2019s Soho district \u2014 the beating heart of the city\u2019s queer community \u2014 which has lost several of its once-iconic LGBTQ+ spaces<\/a> to redevelopments and gentrification over the years. Even this small detail felt like an act of defiance.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n I went into this season with the anticipation that I\u2019d be disappointed because it feels like fantasy media hates being direct about non-heterosexual romance. And when it does include them, the show usually gets canceled immediately after. But while Good Omens<\/em> hasn\u2019t officially been renewed, that appears to be a quirk of the strike \u2014 with most involved planning for a third season. This isn\u2019t a show likely to be cut off at the knees suddenly. So the minute Crowley\u2019s lips canonically<\/em> smashed into Aziraphale\u2019s, I shrieked, sobbed, and called every other queer friend I had to demand they add the series to their watch list. It\u2019s been years since a show made me feel so validated.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n During a press junket ahead of the show\u2019s premiere (which took place before the SAG-AFTRA strike<\/a> officially began), I spoke to David Tennant and Michael Sheen about the new direction their characters took this season. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n Even before the first series came out, the book already had a massive online following where people were interpreting the relationship between the two main characters as closer than what was already implied. Did that influence how you portrayed the characters?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n David Tennant: <\/strong>I think you just have to play the characters as they are. And you have to allow people to decide what they may or may not think that means or implies, you know. The subtext is to be read by the audience, isn\u2019t it? And I don\u2019t think that you play anything specifically because you\u2019re aware that certain people are hoping the relationship will develop in a certain way.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Michael Sheen: <\/strong>And I think Neil had always been very clear that these aren\u2019t humans, and therefore human labels don\u2019t apply in the same way. But I was always very interested from the very beginning about playing a character who is sort of [comprised] of love, and how that might manifest itself in a very particular relationship with another being. So I found it interesting to see how the more that Aziraphale gets comfortable with living on Earth and being among humans and being among human things, how might that be expressed through him and in terms of this relationship.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n I found that very interesting to explore in what we were doing. But like I say, you have to kind of resist putting certain labels on it that aren\u2019t to do with these supernatural beings. They are multifaceted with lots of different aspects. And as Neil played around with in Sandman<\/em> as well with that character [Dream], they could manifest themselves at different times, as different genders, different sexes, and different ages. There\u2019s no end to the possibilities for them. So there\u2019s also no end to the possibilities of what their relationship can be.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Did either of you have any input into how your characters were going to develop in season 2 now that we\u2019ve moved away from the source material?<\/strong><\/p>\n<\/div>\n MS: <\/strong>Well, only so much, I suppose, in how the relationship developed on camera, how we interpreted the scenes, and inhabited the characters. I think Neil is incredibly open. He\u2019s a fan as much as anybody else of the story and the characters. And I think watching us playing those characters probably suggested certain things to him within the parameters of what he and Terry had already worked out. We brought some of the ideas they had for what could happen after the book into season 1. So their ideas for where the story could go, we still haven\u2019t finished yet. But in terms of actually suggesting things, I mean, Neil tends to have a better handle on that sort of thing.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n DT: <\/strong>He\u2019s quite good at all that stuff, isn\u2019t he? So you just want to leave him to it. The last thing you want to do is try to limit his imagination.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n MS: <\/strong>[jokingly<\/em>] \u201cGaiman \u2014 shut it! This is what needs to happen, mate!\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n DT:<\/strong> Yeah, we just sit back and let the scripts roll in.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n None of this is to say that Good Omens<\/em> is the only TV series setting a new standard for queer representation. The swashbuckling pirate comedy Our Flag Means Death<\/em><\/a> has made similar waves (sorry) for directly depicting relationships across the LGBTQ+ spectrum. Coming-of-age stories like Netflix\u2019s Heartstopper<\/em> also excel in representing queer romances. Genre shows like Invasion<\/em>, Warrior Nun<\/em>, and The Wheel of Time<\/em> include major romances centered around two women, but the romances, particularly in the fantasy genre, are rarely centered on queer masculine-presenting characters.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n With its second season, Good Omens<\/em> has managed to create a wonderfully diverse world in a setting where, theoretically, anything is possible. And it does so unapologetically and positively<\/em> \u2014 a host of characters are verbally identified as being queer or genderless, which is a breath of fresh air compared to shows that leave these things open to interpretation, thereby denying viewers from seeing themselves officially<\/em> represented. Similarly, several visibly disabled characters appear in this season, and nobody ever tries to use those physical differences as a plot device. In fact, none of the other characters even mention the differences between them.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Disability representation is something the wider fantasy genre also struggles with. When creator and disability consultant Mark Thompson<\/a> created the \u201cCombat Wheelchair\u201d for the Dungeons & Dragons<\/em> tabletop roleplaying game, some players argued<\/a> that it was unnecessary because in-game magic would have eradicated all disabilities in the D&D<\/em> universe. Yet, it\u2019s wildly offensive to suggest that a game known for providing unimaginably limitless gameplay possibilities should prevent its players from representing themselves in that universe.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n I spoke to actor, comedian, and disability rights activist Liz Carr about her portrayal of Saraqael, an archangel in season 2 of Good Omens<\/em> that, frankly, seems to be the only heavenly employee who\u2019s any good at their job. \u201cI just really loved the casting choices,\u201d she said. \u201cThe character was not written for a wheelchair user, so they chose somebody known for being very sarcastic, i.e., the person who\u2019s right for the role.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u201cI got approached, and Neil said that, \u2018In Heaven, you will be flying. As a wheelchair user, your chair will fly, and on Earth, you\u2019ll be able to form miracles where anything inaccessible will become accessible.\u2019 Cast me or a disabled person, and it gives such fun and such richness, such opportunity. And for people to watch and go, \u2018I\u2019ve never seen that. I\u2019ve never seen me\u2019 … Heaven is about perfect bodies, cured beings. So to not<\/em> be that \u2014 I think that\u2019s very funny.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Other angels are also depicted with disabilities this season. During the flashback in episode 2, the choir of angels sent to reward Job and his wife for their commitment to God includes individuals with Down syndrome and limb differences. These actors aren\u2019t credited, but their inclusion means that Saraqael isn\u2019t a token inclusion \u2014 in Gaiman and Pratchett\u2019s world, anyone can be an angel.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The cliffhanger at the end of the final episode of Good Omens<\/em> season 2 suggests that the show\u2019s diversity and inclusivity won\u2019t slow down any in subsequent episodes. Season 3 has yet to be greenlit (and likely won\u2019t be anytime soon due to the ongoing writers and actors strikes), but Gaiman says he already has it all planned out<\/a> should it be approved. If all goes well, book fans may yet get to see the long-teased<\/a> retirement cottage in the UK\u2019s South Downs<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n