\n<\/p>\n
A significant personnel change is afoot at OpenAI<\/a>, the artificial intelligence juggernaut that has nearly single-handedly inserted the concept of generative AI into global public discourse with the launch of ChatGPT. Dave Willner, an industry veteran who was the startup\u2019s head of trust and safety, announced in a post on LinkedIn<\/a> last night (first spotted by Reuters<\/a>) that he has left the job and transitioned to an advisory role. He plans to spend more time with his young family, he said. He\u2019d been in the role for a year and a half.<\/p>\n His departure is coming at a critical time for the world of AI.<\/p>\n Image Credits:<\/strong> LinkedIn (opens in a new window)<\/span><\/a> under a CC BY 2.0 (opens in a new window)<\/span><\/a> license.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Alongside all the excitement about the capabilities of generative AI platforms \u2014 which are based on large language models and are lighting-fast at producing freely-generated text, images, music and more based on simple prompts from users \u2014 there has been a growing list of questions. How best to regulate activity and companies in this brave new world? How best to mitigate any harmful impacts across a whole spectrum of issues? Trust and safety are foundational parts of those conversations.<\/p>\n Just today<\/a>, OpenAI\u2019s president Greg Brockman is due to appear at White House alongside execs from Anthropic, Google, Inflection, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon to endorse voluntary commitments to pursue shared safety and transparency goals ahead of an AI Executive Order that\u2019s in the works. That comes in the wake of a lot of noise in Europe related to AI regulation, as well as shifting sentiments<\/a> among some others<\/a>.<\/p>\n The important of all this is not lost on OpenAI, which has sought to position itself<\/a> as an aware and responsible player on the field.<\/p>\n Willner doesn\u2019t make any reference to any of that specifically in his LinkedIn post. Instead, he keeps it high-level, noting\u00a0that the demands of his OpenAI job shifted into a \u201chigh-intensity phase\u201d after the launch of ChatGPT.<\/span><\/p>\n \u201cI\u2019m proud of everything our team has accomplished in my time at OpenAI, and while my job there was one of the coolest and most interesting jobs it\u2019s possible to have today, it had also grown dramatically in its scope and scale since I first joined,\u201d he wrote. While he and his wife \u2014 Chariotte Willner, who is also a trust and safety specialist \u2014 both made commitments to always put family first, he said, \u201cin the months following the launch of ChatGPT, I\u2019ve found it more and more difficult to keep up my end of the bargain.\u201d<\/p>\n Willner been in his OpenAI post for just 1.5 years, but he comes from a long career in the field that includes leading trust and safety teams at Facebook and Airbnb.<\/p>\n The Facebook work is especially interesting. There, he was an early employee who helped spell out the company\u2019s first community standards position, which is still used as the basis of the company\u2019s approach today.<\/p>\n That was a very formative period for the company, and arguably \u2014 given the influence Facebook has had on how social media has developed globally \u2014 for the internet and society overall. Some of those years were marked by very outspoken positions on the freedom of speech, and how Facebook needed to resist calls to rein in controversial groups and controversial posts.<\/p>\n One case in point was a very big dispute, in 2009, played out in the public forum about how Facebook was handling accounts and posts from Holocaust Deniers. Some employees and outside observers felt that Facebook had a duty to take a stand and ban those posts. Others believed that doing so was akin to censorship and sent the wrong message around free discourse.<\/p>\n Willner was in the latter camp, believing that \u201chate speech\u201d was not the same as \u201cdirect harm\u201d and should therefore not be moderated the same. \u201cI do not believe that Holocaust Denial, as an idea on it\u2019s [sic] own, inherently represents a threat to the safety of others,\u201d he wrote at the time. (For a blast from the TechCrunch past, see the full post on this here.<\/a>)<\/p>\n In retrospect, given how so much else has played out, it was a pretty short-sighted, naive position. But, it seems that at least some of those ideas did evolve. By 2019, no longer employed by the social network, he was speaking out against<\/a> how the company wanted to grant politicians and public figures weaker content moderation exceptions.<\/p>\n But if the need for laying the right groundwork at Facebook was bigger than people at the time anticipated, that is arguably even more the case now for the new wave of tech. According to this New York Times story<\/a> from less than a month ago, Willner had been brought on to OpenAI initially to help it figure out how to keep Dall-E, the startup\u2019s image generator, from getting misused and used for things like the creation of generative AI child pornography.<\/p>\n