\n<\/p>\n
U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer is about to announce a ban on social media usage for children under the age of 16, according to multiple reports.<\/p>\n
While the government had previously revealed that it was studying options around a ban<\/a>, both the Guardian<\/a> and the Financial Times<\/a> said that Starmer is now ready to unveil the policy in a speech on Monday.<\/p>\n Government sources told the Guardian that the U.K. ban will cover a similar range of social platforms as Australia<\/a>, where TikTok, YouTube, Instagram, Reddit, Facebook, X, Threads, Snapchat, Twitch, and Kick are all banned for users under 16.<\/p>\n Other products, such as gaming apps, would not be banned outright, but for their younger users, they\u2019d need to remove features like the ability to chat with strangers. The policy would also prohibit users under 18 from accessing romantic and sexual chatbots and seek to prevent late-night scrolling.<\/p>\n The government can use its existing regulatory powers to enforce some aspects of a ban, but new legislation may also be required, the Guardian said.<\/p>\n The U.K. is one of a number of countries following Australia\u2019s lead by considering bans on social media use<\/a> by children. The U.K. already passed an age verification law<\/a> that was similarly touted as protecting the safety of children online.<\/p>\n These bans come amidst growing discussion around the effect of social media usage on teens and children<\/a> \u2014 for example, the mother of murdered teen Brianna Ghey has called for a teen social media ban in the U.K.<\/a> and said her daughter\u2019s eating order and self-harming behavior were \u201csignificantly exacerbated by the harmful content she was consuming online.\u201d<\/p>\n At the same time, these bans have been criticized for potentially violating user privacy and isolating children, while offering unproven benefits to their mental health.<\/a><\/p>\n Age verification laws \u2014 which, unlike outright bans, have taken effect in multiple U.S. states \u2014 have also been criticized as threats to online privacy and anonymity. And the verification methods aren\u2019t exactly foolproof<\/a>.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n When you purchase through links in our articles, we may earn a small commission<\/a>. This doesn\u2019t affect our editorial independence.<\/em><\/p>\n