\n<\/p>\n
\nFrom @TheAthletic<\/a>: The Indiana Fever have revoked the credentials of longtime beat reporter Scott Agness because of a social media report they claim spread \u201cinaccurate and unsubstantiated\u201d information regarding Caitlin Clark\u2019s health status. https:\/\/t.co\/iPfgYTBhbR<\/a><\/p>\n
\u2014 The New York Times (@nytimes) June 3, 2026<\/a><\/p><\/blockquote>\n
“According to [longtime Indiana Pacers and Fever beat reporter Scott] Agness, the Fever notified him via email on May 21 that he would be barred from accessing team events because of a social media report they claim spread \u201cinaccurate and unsubstantiated\u201d information regarding Caitlin Clark\u2019s health status<\/b> for the season.<\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
The report in question came on May 20, when Clark was ruled out 100 minutes before the Fever played the Portland Fire. According to Agness\u2019 post on X, Clark\u2019s unavailability was part of a strategic management plan for the season.<\/b><\/p>\n
…<\/p>\n
Clark\u2019s first absence of the 2026 season drew heavy scrutiny after the Fever failed to list her on the team\u2019s injury report despite her missing practice the day before their game against the Fire. The Fever also did not update the injury report at any point Wednesday even though Clark woke up with what White described as \u201csome stiffness and some soreness.\u201d The Fever were later given a warning by the WNBA for violating injury report protocol.<\/b><\/p>\n
source<\/a>
ontd do you think caitlin clark has lived up to the hype? \ud83e\udd2d <\/p>\n<\/div>\n