\n<\/p>\n
A long-running law that has allowed U.S. intelligence agencies to collect and analyze huge amounts of overseas communications without needing search warrants is set to expire April 30, and lawmakers are in a deadlock over whether to allow the Trump administration to extend it without any changes.<\/p>\n
Known as Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA), the law allows the National Security Agency, the CIA, the FBI and other federal intelligence agencies to record overseas communications that flow through the United States without needing individualized search warrants.<\/p>\n
In sweeping up much of the world\u2019s communications, the agencies also collect unfathomable amounts of information, including phone logs and emails, on Americans who interact with people subject to surveillance overseas. This data is collected despite constitutional protections that should shield Americans and people in the United States from government surveillance.<\/p>\n
But ahead of the law\u2019s expiry on April 30 following a brief extension passed last week<\/a>, a bipartisan, pro-privacy group of House lawmakers and Senators are calling for sweeping changes to FISA, arguing that the changes are \u201cessential\u201d for protecting the privacy rights of Americans.<\/p>\n Some lawmakers are calling for widespread reforms following years of scandals and surveillance abuses across successive U.S. administrations, while others are holding their vote<\/a> to further their own political goals by attaching the provisions to other legislation.\u00a0<\/p>\n A social media post<\/a> from President Trump suggests that \u2014 at least for now \u2014 the White House is keen on the idea of passing a simple re-authorization without any changes to the law.<\/p>\n The bipartisan group\u2019s legislative fix is the Government Surveillance Reform Act, introduced into Congress in March by Sens. Ron Wyden (D-OR), Mike Lee (R-UT) and others<\/a>, which aims to curtail some of the government\u2019s warrantless surveillance programs. Among other things, the lawmakers seek provisions to prevent government agencies from using a \u201cbackdoor search\u201d loophole that allows them to trawl the communications of Americans without first obtaining a search warrant.<\/p>\n Another key provision would prevent federal agencies from buying commercially available data about Americans from data brokers \u2014 a practice the U.S. government has long asserted<\/a> that it does not need a court\u2019s permission for.<\/p>\n App developers collect reams of location data from people who use smartphone apps, and then sell that information to brokers, who in turn sell that data to governments and militaries. FBI director Kash Patel confirmed in a congressional hearing<\/a> in March that the FBI buys Americans\u2019 location data without seeking court authorization.<\/p>\n Both Republicans and Democrats are reportedly keen on closing this loophole<\/a>, which allows spy agencies to buy commercial data and use AI models to analyze billions of location points. This is currently also a sticking point in the U.S. government\u2019s negotiations with Anthropic and OpenAI over the unrestricted use of their tools<\/a>.<\/p>\n The American Civil Liberties Union, Electronic Privacy Information Center, and the Project on Government Oversight are among some of the privacy groups supporting the bipartisan bill.<\/p>\n It\u2019s currently unclear if the bill will pass, but lawmakers say legislative reforms are necessary, especially as technological advancements make it easier for tech companies and governments to surveil people than ever before.<\/p>\n Wyden, the longest-serving lawmaker to sit on any congressional intelligence committee and a known privacy hawk, has warned that many lawmakers are not fully aware that multiple U.S. administrations have long relied on a secret, legal interpretation of Section 702 that \u201cdirectly affects the privacy rights of Americans.\u201d Wyden said the matter remains secret, but urged the government to declassify the information so lawmakers can discuss it.\u00a0<\/p>\n