\n<\/p>\n
For the past two weeks, X has been flooded with AI-manipulated nude images, created by the Grok AI chatbot. An alarming range of women have been affected by the non-consensual nudes, including prominent models and actresses, as well as news figures<\/a>, crime victims<\/a>, and even world leaders<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n A December 31 research paper from Copyleaks<\/a> estimated roughly one image was being posted each minute, but later tests found far more.<\/a> A sample gathered from January 5-6 found 6,700 per hour over the 24-hour period<\/a>.\u00a0<\/p>\n But while public figures from around the world have decried the choice to release the model without safeguards, there are few clear mechanisms for regulators hoping to rein in Elon Musk\u2019s new image-manipulating system. The result has become a painful lesson in the limits of tech regulation \u2014 and a forward-looking challenge for regulators hoping to make a mark.<\/p>\n Unsurprisingly, the most aggressive action has come from the European Commission, which on Thursday ordered xAI to retain all documents<\/a> related to its Grok chatbot. The move doesn\u2019t necessarily mean the commission has opened up a new investigation, but it\u2019s a common precursor to such action. It\u2019s particularly ominous given recent reporting from CNN<\/a> that suggests Elon Musk may have personally intervened to prevent safeguards from being placed on what images could be generated by Grok.<\/p>\n It\u2019s unclear whether X has made any technical changes to the Grok model, although the public media tab for Grok\u2019s X account has been removed. In a statement, the company specifically denounced the use of AI tools to produce child sexual imagery. \u201cAnyone using or prompting Grok to make illegal content will suffer the same consequences as if they upload illegal content,\u201d the X Safety account posted on January 3<\/a>, echoing a previous tweet by Elon Musk.<\/p>\n In the meantime, regulators around the world have issued stern warnings. The United Kingdom\u2019s Ofcom issued a statement on Monday<\/a>, saying it was in touch with xAI and \u201cwill undertake a swift assessment to determine whether there are potential compliance issues that warrant investigation.\u201d In a radio interview on Thursday<\/a>, U.K. Prime Minister Keir Starmer called the phenomenon \u201cdisgraceful\u201d and \u201cdisgusting,\u201d saying \u201cOfcom has our full support to take action in relation to this.\u201d<\/p>\n In a post on LinkedIn<\/a>, Australian eSafety Commissioner Julie Inman-Grant said her office had received a doubling in complaints related to Grok since late 2025. But Inman-Grant stopped short of taking action against xAI, saying only, \u201cWe will use the range of regulatory tools at our disposal to investigate and take appropriate action.\u201d<\/p>\n Techcrunch event<\/p>\n \n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tSan Francisco<\/span> By far the largest market to threaten action is India, where Grok was the subject of a formal complaint from a member of Parliament. On January, India\u2019s communications regulator MeitY ordered X to address the issue and submit an \u201caction-taken\u201d report within 72 hours \u2014 a deadline that was subsequently extended by 48 hours. While a report was submitted to the regulator on January 7<\/a>, it\u2019s unclear whether MeitY will be satisfied with the response. If not, X could lose its safe harbor status in India, a potentially serious limitation on its ability to operate within the country.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t|<\/span>
\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\t\tOctober 13-15, 2026<\/span>\n\t\t\t\t\t\t\t<\/p>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/p><\/div>\n<\/div>\n