\n<\/p>\n
There are many questions surrounding George Santos,<\/strong> the New York congressman who was indicted<\/a> in May on more than a dozen federal charges, including wire fraud, money laundering, and stealing public funds. Questions like: When did he first decide to lie about four of his firm\u2019s employees losing their lives<\/a> in the 2016 Pulse nightclub shooting, and his mother being in the south tower<\/a> on 9\/11? Or: How does he sleep at night having allegedly swindled<\/a> thousands of dollars meant to go toward surgery for a disabled vet\u2019s dying dog? And: Did he really think anyone was going to believe he was a male model<\/a> or a volleyball star<\/a> at Baruch College?<\/p>\n But last month, after Santos was released on a $500,000 bail bond following his indictment, another pressing question emerged: Who are the three people that put up the half a million to make that happen? Santos, for his part, does not want the identities of these people revealed\u2014so much so that he reportedly told a judge that he would rather go to jail<\/a> than have their names be made public. And that could very well happen, if he doesn\u2019t comply with a court order.<\/p>\n Per The Guardian<\/em><\/a>:<\/em><\/p>\n The Republican congressman and serial fabulist\u00a0George Santos\u00a0has until Friday to appeal an order to reveal the identities of three people who guaranteed his $500,000 bond on fraud charges, a New York judge said on Tuesday. A lawyer for Santos had said identification of the guarantors would imperil their \u201chealth, safety and wellbeing,\u201d and claimed the New York congressman would rather go to prison than reveal the names.<\/p>\n \u201cMy client would rather surrender to pre-trial detainment than subject these suretors to what will inevitably come,\u201d the lawyer, Joseph Murray,<\/strong> wrote to the judge on Monday.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n After pleading not guilty last month, Santos, invoking another famous liar<\/a>, claimed the charges against him are part of a \u201cwitch hunt,\u201d adding: \u201cI\u2019m going to fight my battle, I\u2019m going to fight the witch hunt, I\u2019m going to take care of clearing my name.\u201d Among other delusions, the freshman congressman apparently believes<\/a> he has a shot at winning a second term.<\/p>\n If you would like to receive the Levin Report in your inbox daily, click<\/em> here<\/em><\/a> to subscribe.<\/em><\/p>\n Donald Trump takes a moment out of his day to explain why it\u2019s important to verbally abuse people<\/strong><\/p>\n Gather round, kids, and listen to Uncle Donny\u2019s latest life tip<\/a>:<\/p>\n Many say don\u2019t \u201cpunch down\u201d when talking about people like Chris Sununu,<\/strong> \u201cSloppy\u201d Chris Christie,<\/strong> \u201cAida\u201d [Asa] Hutchinson,<\/strong> or others, but sometimes it\u2019s necessary to talk badly about those that, for no reason other than politics, speak badly about you. You have to put them in proper perspective, you have to put them in their place!<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/blockquote>\n We assume this piece of advice will be included in Trump\u2019s next self-help book.<\/p>\n Ted Cruz still happily going to bat for the guy who<\/strong> suggested<\/strong><\/a> his father was in on the assassination of JFK<\/strong><\/p>\n This content can also be viewed on the site it originates<\/a> from.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n\n
\n
Twitter content<\/h4>\n