\n<\/p>\n
When Donald Trump<\/strong> replaced US attorney for the Eastern District of Virginia Erik Siebert<\/strong> with Lindsey Halligan<\/strong> recently, he made no secret of her job responsibilities: Go after Adam Schiff, Letitia James,<\/strong> and James Comey.<\/strong> \u201cWe can\u2019t delay any longer,\u201d the president wrote<\/a> in a social media post to his attorney general, Pam Bondi,<\/strong> noting that \u201cLindsey Halligan is a really good lawyer.\u201d<\/p>\n Halligan is expected to fulfill her boss\u2019s demands: Though prosecutors reportedly<\/a> advised against charging Comey for lack of probable cause, she is expected to indict the former FBI director in the coming days.<\/p>\n That should satisfy Trump, who has long nursed a grudge against Comey over the Russia investigation that loomed over the beginning of his first term. But it could also open up Halligan to legal trouble, an ethics professor at her law school tells Vanity Fair.<\/em><\/p>\n Halligan is a member of the Florida bar, explains Anthony V. Alfieri,<\/strong> director of the Center for Ethics and Public Service at Miami University School of Law, where Halligan earned her JD in 2013. That means she is bound by the Florida Rules of Professional Conduct. \u201cShe carries special responsibilities of a prosecutor in a criminal case,\u201d Alfieri says. \u201cAmong those responsibilities is the core duty to refrain from prosecuting a charge that the prosecutor knows is not supported by probable cause.\u201d Additionally, rules prohibit her \u201cfrom engaging in conduct involving dishonesty, deceit, or misrepresentation,\u201d says Alfieri, who did not know Halligan in school.<\/p>\n \u201cIn sum,\u201d Alfieri says, \u201cHalligan\u2019s charging of Comey in Virginia puts Halligan herself at professional risk of disciplinary prosecution in Florida.\u201d<\/p>\n Halligan comes to her post with no prosecutorial experience: She worked in insurance law until 2022, when she began working for Trump, including on his classified documents case. When Trump returned to office in 2025, she was appointed<\/a> senior associate staff secretary in his White House, overseeing his effort to root out \u201cimproper ideology\u201d from the Smithsonian. Now, she finds herself in the unusual position of having to find something to charge Comey with\u2014before a statute of limitations runs out on Tuesday. \u201cThis isn\u2019t normally a problem prosecutors face, as they start with a crime, then figure out whodunnit, rather than starting with a person and only then deciding whatthedun,\u201d as Benjamin Wittes<\/strong> and Anna Bower<\/strong> wrote<\/a> in Lawfare<\/em> on Wednesday. \u201cBut Trump wants Comey charged and is convinced he\u2019s guilty of something,<\/em> and it\u2019s your job now to figure out what.\u201d<\/p>\n Comey, who was appointed by Barack Obama,<\/strong> led the FBI from 2013 to 2017. Two years into his tenure, the bureau opened its inquiry into Hillary Clinton<\/strong>\u2019s use of a private email server as secretary of state. In July 2016, just before she formally accepted the Democratic nomination for president, Comey announced that while the investigation found she had been \u201cextremely careless\u201d in her handling of classified materials, there was no cause to bring charges. But that October\u2014less than two weeks before Election Day\u2014Comey publicly announced the probe had been reopened. The inquiry did not alter the FBI\u2019s initial findings from the first investigation, but his public comments were widely seen as a major influence on the 2016 election.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n