{"id":148182,"date":"2025-02-04T22:20:27","date_gmt":"2025-02-04T22:20:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/04\/nobody-knows-whats-coming-next-will-donald-trump-be-able-to-use-the-military-against-immigrants-and-us-citizens\/"},"modified":"2025-02-04T22:20:27","modified_gmt":"2025-02-04T22:20:27","slug":"nobody-knows-whats-coming-next-will-donald-trump-be-able-to-use-the-military-against-immigrants-and-us-citizens","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/2025\/02\/04\/nobody-knows-whats-coming-next-will-donald-trump-be-able-to-use-the-military-against-immigrants-and-us-citizens\/","title":{"rendered":"\u201cNobody Knows What\u2019s Coming Next\u201d: Will Donald Trump Be Able to Use the Military Against Immigrants\u2014and US Citizens?"},"content":{"rendered":"<p> <br \/>\n<\/p>\n<div>\n<p class=\"has-dropcap\">It was Pearl Harbor\u2013level language. \u201cAmerica\u2019s sovereignty is under attack,\u201d <strong>Donald Trump<\/strong> proclaimed on day one of his return to the White House. The president\u2019s cause for alarm? A \u201cNational emergency at the southern border,\u201d as the administration labeled it, referring to a frontier that, for all intents and purposes, was comparatively quiet.<\/p>\n<p>The same day, he called on the commanders of the US armed forces to prepare for potential <em>domestic<\/em> law enforcement. To that end, he asked that plans be drawn up to invoke, if necessary, a nearly 220-year-old \u201cinsurrection\u201d law that would give him authority to send federal troops to crack down on the purported southern \u201cinvasion.\u201d Later that week, the new secretary of defense, <strong>Pete Hegseth,<\/strong> said <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/01\/27\/us\/politics\/hegseth-defense.html?searchResultPosition=1\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/01\/27\/us\/politics\/hegseth-defense.html?searchResultPosition=1&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/01\/27\/us\/politics\/hegseth-defense.html?searchResultPosition=1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">in his first remarks at the Pentagon<\/a> that the military was ready to shift its priorities from possible overseas deployment and engagement to \u201cthe defense of the territorial integrity of the United States of America\u201d in compliance with \u201cthe Constitution, the laws of our land and the directives of the commander.\u201d<\/p>\n<aside aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"PullQuoteEmbedWrapper-sc-EoVjf fQbAzo\" data-testid=\"pullquote-embed\">\n<div class=\"PullQuoteEmbedContent-sc-kTcfhx iKEmcs\">\n<p class=\"paywall\">Reminder: shaking free of such ironclad bonds to executive and military authority is why the colonies rebelled against the British in the first place.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<p class=\"paywall\">And this past weekend, President Trump and Governor <strong>Greg Abbott<\/strong> <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/texas-national-guard-deputized-make-immigration-arrests.amp\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/texas-national-guard-deputized-make-immigration-arrests.amp&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.foxnews.com\/politics\/texas-national-guard-deputized-make-immigration-arrests.amp\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">reached a deal<\/a> to grant the Texas National Guard new authority to make immigration arrests as long as they were alongside immigration officers and border patrol agents. This was, in fact, a \u201clegal action,\u201d but one normally seen only in times of serious crises.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Such declarations and acts seemed chilling, yet specific: Trump\u2019s and Hegseth\u2019s decrees clearly targeted migrants seeking to destabilize the American homeland. Then again, maybe not. Indeed, some have begun to wonder if the president and secretary of defense are preparing for a more all-encompassing contingency: not only an armed bulwark against an <a href=\"https:\/\/www.reuters.com\/world\/americas\/migrant-arrests-us-mexico-border-lower-than-when-trump-left-office-2025-01-07\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">already diminishing immigrant influx at the border<\/a>, but also for a mobilization that could be utilized against political opponents who supposedly threaten the nation\u2019s \u201cterritorial integrity\u201d\u2014with troops potentially marching into states and sanctuary cities, even schools and private homes, that resist deportation orders. This is, after all, the playbook of autocrats. Reminder: shaking free of such ironclad bonds to executive and military authority is why the colonies rebelled against the British in the first place.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">What might the president be up to? What are the precedents for invoking the Insurrection Act? And what are individual members of the American military doing to anticipate choices they may have to make in the weeks and months ahead?<\/p>\n<p class=\"has-dropcap paywall\">Trump, it should be noted, flirted with invoking the Insurrection Act during his first administration. That law, which is an amalgamation of statutes enacted between 1792 and 1871, grants the president sole authority to send armed forces into rebellious states, even over the objections of their governments. During the civil unrest that followed the murder of George Floyd, on June 1, 2020, <a href=\"https:\/\/trumpwhitehouse.archives.gov\/briefings-statements\/statement-by-the-president-39\/\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Trump warned<\/a>, \u201cIf a city or state refuses to take the actions that are necessary to defend the life and property of their residents, then I will deploy the United States military and quickly solve the problem for them.\u201d <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/06\/02\/us\/politics\/military-national-guard-trump-protests.html?searchResultPosition=1\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/06\/02\/us\/politics\/military-national-guard-trump-protests.html?searchResultPosition=1&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2020\/06\/02\/us\/politics\/military-national-guard-trump-protests.html?searchResultPosition=1\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><em>The<\/em> <em>New York Times<\/em> noted<\/a> at the time that Trump planned to announce he was ready to use his powers under the rarely invoked law to override governors and send active-duty troops to states where there were protests. Trump was reportedly dissuaded from such a declaration by senior White House and Pentagon officials.<\/p>\n<div class=\"GenericCalloutWrapper-tojWn kjpZpJ callout--has-top-border\" data-testid=\"GenericCallout\">\n<div class=\"ExternalLinkEmbedWrapper-hNDkqw eLprFC\" data-testid=\"external-link-embed--inline\"><a aria-label=\"Sub Snub\" class=\"external-link external-link-embed__image-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/news\/2021\/09\/sub-snub-deja-vu-the-us-and-france-have-been-here-before&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/news\/2021\/09\/sub-snub-deja-vu-the-us-and-france-have-been-here-before\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\"><picture class=\"ResponsiveImagePicture-cWuUZO dUOtEa ExternalLinkEmbedResponsiveImage-iGydLQ kHgShD responsive-image\"><\/picture><\/a><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<p class=\"paywall\">But that same month, he <em>did<\/em> send troops into Washington, DC, the one place in the country where he would not face opposition from a governor. That was when peaceful demonstrators were <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/news\/2020\/06\/white-house-tear-gas-protesters-so-trump-could-have-a-photo-op?srsltid=AfmBOoqHsYvJAtwbIVBDpcavJRSb3vJyqeSBL8LqPJvNJivin2hVd8JG\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">forcefully cleared from Lafayette Square<\/a> by US Park Police, National Guard members, and law enforcement officers from various federal agencies, including the Secret Service. On that occasion, Secretary of Defense <strong>Mark Esper,<\/strong> along with <strong>Mark Milley<\/strong>\u2014the chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, dressed in US Army fatigues\u2014walked briefly together with Trump into the square, stopping at St. John\u2019s Church, where <a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/news\/2020\/06\/no-one-is-impressed-by-trump-tough-guy-church-photo-op?srsltid=AfmBOopNhUFs5Ys7iQu5Xb_0dmqKqgJjUucCMjxY6IoBoJoM5xJKZYB1\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the president posed for photographs<\/a> while holding a Bible.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Shortly thereafter, a chagrined Milley issued an apology for agreeing to take part in such a display. \u201cI should not have been there,\u201d he stated during a <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.americanrhetoric.com\/speeches\/markmilleynationaldefenseuniversitygraduationremarks.htm\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.americanrhetoric.com\/speeches\/markmilleynationaldefenseuniversitygraduationremarks.htm&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.americanrhetoric.com\/speeches\/markmilleynationaldefenseuniversitygraduationremarks.htm\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">commencement address<\/a> at National Defense University, an educational center for top military and national security leadership in Washington, DC. \u201cMy presence in that moment and in that environment created a perception of the military involved in domestic politics. As a commissioned uniformed officer, it was a mistake that I have learned from, and I sincerely hope we all can learn from it.\u201d Milley, now retired and recently granted a <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/defense\/5094993-biden-pardon-milley-trump-feud\/\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/defense\/5094993-biden-pardon-milley-trump-feud\/&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/thehill.com\/policy\/defense\/5094993-biden-pardon-milley-trump-feud\/\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">preemptive pardon<\/a> by <strong>Joe Biden,<\/strong> still faces Trump\u2019s wrath\u2014including <a data-offer-url=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/01\/28\/us\/politics\/trump-pentagon-milley-security.html\" class=\"external-link\" data-event-click=\"{&quot;element&quot;:&quot;ExternalLink&quot;,&quot;outgoingURL&quot;:&quot;https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/01\/28\/us\/politics\/trump-pentagon-milley-security.html&quot;}\" href=\"https:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2025\/01\/28\/us\/politics\/trump-pentagon-milley-security.html\" rel=\"nofollow noopener\" target=\"_blank\">possible demotion in rank<\/a>\u2014for this and other statements and actions.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">The Insurrection Act is murky. Part of the reason is that sending soldiers to do police work is inherently risky, even when seemingly justified. The last time the Insurrection Act was invoked was almost 33 years ago. In May 1992, George H.W. Bush summoned the Marines to help quell <a href=\"https:\/\/archive.vanityfair.com\/article\/1992\/7\/the-selling-of-rodney-king\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">the Los Angeles riots<\/a> that followed the acquittals of four officers charged with assault in the beating of Rodney King. Some 13,500 federal troops, including more than 10,000 from the California National Guard, accompanied the LAPD.<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">At one point, in the waning days of the unrest, seven marines went along with two local police officers responding to a domestic violence call. What was an ordinary situation for the cops was anything but for the soldiers, according to <strong>Joseph Nunn,<\/strong> a lawyer who works with the Liberty and National Security Program of the Brennan Center, an independent think tank. \u201cThese Marines now found themselves playing a role for which they had little training: that of civilian law enforcement officer,\u201d he explains in a report on reforming the Insurrection Act. He describes the scene: someone inside the house fired a shotgun through the door. One of the officers shouted, \u201cCover me.\u201d For the police, that meant: hold your weapons up in a position ready to fire, if necessary. \u201cThe Marines,\u201d writes Nunn, \u201cin accordance with their own training, took it as a request for suppressing fire. They riddled the home with more than 200 bullets. Miraculously, no one was killed.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">This is not to say that trained US soldiers are never deployed on American soil. Today, under normal legal precedent, the military is already actively working in support of law enforcement, with some 4,000 federal troops aiding border and Customs agents, though typically without power to arrest offenders. The Pentagon, meanwhile, operates military flights when apprehended immigrants are returned to their home nations. But these activities are different from direct, face-to-face engagement by uniformed military personnel in domestic law enforcement matters. To take that fateful step, Trump would have to invoke the Insurrection Act.<\/p>\n<aside aria-hidden=\"true\" class=\"PullQuoteEmbedWrapper-sc-EoVjf fQbAzo\" data-testid=\"pullquote-embed\">\n<div class=\"PullQuoteEmbedContent-sc-kTcfhx iKEmcs\">\n<p class=\"paywall\">\u201cHistory makes clear the Insurrection Act is a tool of last resort, not something to be used for routine law enforcement or longstanding policy challenges.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/aside>\n<p class=\"paywall\">The first step down this path came on Inauguration Day. Trump\u2019s emergency order set a 90-day deadline for the secretaries of defense and homeland security to have an action plan for obtaining \u201ccomplete operational control of the southern border, including whether to invoke the Insurrection Act.\u201d<\/p>\n<p class=\"paywall\">Why would the president need such approval? Because of Congress\u2019s checks and balances on a president\u2019s executive power when it comes to using troops. The Constitution, in various ways, limits military involvement in civilian affairs. But it does not entirely bar federal armed forces from conducting law enforcement actions. Instead, a <em>partial<\/em> prohibition comes from the Posse Comitatus Act of 1878. In it, Congress expressly forbids federal armed forces from acting as police on the nation\u2019s streets unless such action is authorized by Congress or the Constitution. But there\u2019s one gaping loophole that comes into play only when the president, in a time of national or state emergency, unilaterally invokes the Insurrection Act. <a href=\"https:\/\/www.brennancenter.org\/our-work\/research-reports\/posse-comitatus-act-explained\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">According to the Brennan Center<\/a>: \u201cThe Insurrection Act allows the president\u2014with or without the state government\u2019s consent\u2014to use the military to enforce federal law or suppress a rebellion against federal authority in a state.\u201d Even if a state\u2019s government objects, soldiers can, at the president\u2019s behest, march in to stop insurrections and act as police.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n<p><br \/>\n<br \/><a href=\"https:\/\/www.vanityfair.com\/news\/story\/donald-trump-military-domestic-deployment\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noopener\">Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>It was Pearl Harbor\u2013level language. \u201cAmerica\u2019s sovereignty is under attack,\u201d Donald Trump proclaimed on day one of his return to the White House. The president\u2019s cause for alarm? A \u201cNational emergency at the southern border,\u201d as the administration labeled it, referring to a frontier that, for all intents and purposes, was comparatively quiet. The same [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":148183,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[4],"tags":[54,1881,4837,1791],"class_list":{"0":"post-148182","1":"post","2":"type-post","3":"status-publish","4":"format-standard","5":"has-post-thumbnail","7":"category-celebrity","8":"tag-donald-trump","9":"tag-immigration","10":"tag-military","11":"tag-white-house"},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148182","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=148182"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/148182\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/148183"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=148182"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=148182"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/entertainment.runfyers.com\/index.php\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=148182"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}