\n<\/p>\n
SafeRent, an AI screening tool used by landlords, will no longer use AI-powered \u201cscores\u201d to evaluate whether someone using housing vouchers would make a good tenant. On Wednesday, US District Judge Angel Kelley issued final approval<\/a> for a roughly $2.3 million settlement to prevent SafeRent from discriminating against tenants based on income and race.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n The settlement stems from a 2022 class action lawsuit filed<\/a> in Massachusetts. The suit alleged that SafeRent\u2019s scoring system disproportionately harmed people using housing vouchers \u2014 specifically Black and Hispanic applicants. In addition to violating Massachusetts law, the complaint also accused SafeRent of breaking the Fair Housing Act, which prohibits housing discrimination.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n As outlined in the initial lawsuit, SafeRent\u2019s scoring algorithm uses factors like credit history and non-rental-related debts to assign a SafeRent Score to potential tenants. Landlords can then use this score to determine whether to accept or deny someone\u2019s rental application. The lawsuit claimed the process isn\u2019t transparent, as SafeRent doesn\u2019t tell landlords how it came up with a person\u2019s score. And the system allegedly assigned lower scores unfairly for Black and Hispanic tenants, as well as people who use housing vouchers, leading landlords to deny their housing applications.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n Under the five-year settlement, SafeRent will no longer display a tenant screening score for applicants using housing vouchers nationwide, nor can it include a score when landlords use its \u201caffordable\u201d SafeRent Score model. SafeRent\u2019s service also can\u2019t display recommendations on whether to \u201caccept\u201d or \u201cdeny\u201d someone\u2019s application if they use housing vouchers. This means landlords will now have to evaluate renters who use housing vouchers based on their entire record \u2014 rather than just using their SafeRent score. <\/p>\n<\/div>\n \u201cCredit scores and scores modeled similarly, such as SafeRent Scores, draw on information that has only be[en] tested at predicting repayment of credit obligations,\u201d Shennan Kavanagh, the director of the National Consumer Law Center, said in a statement. \u201cThere is no evidence such data is predictive of tenants paying rent.\u201d <\/p>\n<\/div>\n The money collected as part of the settlement will go to Massachusetts-based rental applicants who used housing vouchers and weren\u2019t able to secure housing due to SafeRent\u2019s tenant score. \u201cWhile SafeRent continues to believe the SRS [SafeRent Solutions] Scores comply with all applicable laws, litigation is time-consuming and expensive,\u201d SafeRent spokesperson Yazmin Lopez said in a statement to The Verge<\/em>. \u201cIt became increasingly clear that defending the SRS Score in this case would divert time and resources SafeRent can better use to serve its core mission of giving housing providers the tools they need to screen applicants.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n SafeRent is the latest algorithm-driven property management software to face legal action. In August, the Department of Justice sued<\/a> RealPage over claims its algorithmic pricing software raises rent.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n