\n<\/p>\n
Reliance Jio, India\u2019s largest telecoms operator, has initiated what analysts expect to be an industry-wide increase in tariffs in the world\u2019s second largest wireless market, raising some of its plans by more than 20%.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Jio\u2019s revised pricing structure, effective July 3, sees its entry-level Rs 155 ($1.87) plan, offering 2GB of data and unlimited calls, increase to Rs 189. Similarly, a plan providing 1GB of daily data usage will rise from Rs 209 to Rs 249. Jio \u2014 part of India\u2019s most valuable firm, Reliance Industries \u2014 is similarly raising prices of its two-month, three-month, annual, postpaid, and data add-on plans.<\/p>\n
Akash Ambani, Chairman of Reliance Jio, said in a statement the move is a \u201cstep in the direction of furthering industry innovation and driving sustainable growth through investments in 5G and AI technology.\u201d<\/p>\n Reliance, Bharti Airtel, Vodafone-Idea and BSNL-MTNL dominate the Indian wireless market. Jio commanded more than 40% of the market as of April (the most recent data made available by the Indian telecom regulator), with its nearest rival, Airtel, at 33.1%.\u00a0<\/p>\n Analysts have been forecasting a significant shift in the industry\u2019s pricing strategy for months. The consensus view projected an increase of 15-25%, a move seen as crucial for stabilising and growing average revenue per user (ARPU).\u00a0<\/p>\n This move underscores the sector\u2019s transition from a focus on market share acquisition to sustained monetisation, coming as operators near the completion of their 5G coverage rollouts. Indian telecom operators spent more than $20 billion in buying 5G airwaves<\/a> alone.\u00a0They have been scrambling to find ways to make more money. Last year, they proposed that tech firms pay the telecom companies for network usage<\/a>.<\/p>\n Consumers in India are expected to stomach the new prices because, as Bank of America wrote in a note earlier this year, Indians have the ability to \u201cabsorb 20-25% hike given lack of alternatives\/improving stickiness of data offerings.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n